Revamped for 2010

Today, I was listening to the radio and there was a whole call in session about airport security, scanning residue of gunpowder, and what have you. The problem isn't so much that the scan is intrusive but it's "lnconvenient" to have to be pulled aside and questioned, it's unamerican, unconstitutional, blah, blah, blah. Here's my opinion on this complaint: shut the hell up.

Seriously. No one is trying to take your stupid guns, which by the way, the rest of us can seem to do without Davey Crockett, and if your feeling inconvenienced--tough. You know what, I don't feel safe with you yahoo's running around with your guns. And guess what else, your not the police, your not the military, your not an air Marshall, your a cowardly wannabe cowboy and you should be held up and inconvenienced and ridiculed since you can't seem to function without a crutch like a gun like the rest of us.

See, this isn't the Old West and it's not Nazi Germany, noones gunning each other down in the street and no ones kicking in your door to take your perfectly legally purchased guns. Also the government you fear so much doesn't really care about you having a gun, just what you do with it. Personally I think anyone found guilty of killing someone with a gun, not at their home, on their property or in self defense at the aforementioned should get automatic next day execution, as part of the right. It's fair, considering most people say they wanna be able to hunt, so if you kill a person well you forfeit your life as well, period.

See, this isn't a debate, it seems simple to me, if your "Man enough" or "Women Enough" to carry a gun you should have a pretty easy to understand and expeditious law to govern you. Why do you need a gun in a restaurant? Why on an airplane? Why in a public building? Thats why there is security and domestic police. If you can't understand that, you should move...to another country frankly. I'm not looking to hear "the other side" of the argument, there isn't one. Like I said, I'm for gun rights, I just think there should be fatal penalties, having a weapon is a responsibility, one I think isn't fit for most people in the U.S. but it is your right, just be prepared to face the ultimate price if you like having the ultimate freedom--- The ability whether justly or unjustly in your mind to take another life.

How much are you willing to pay?

A while ago I was perusing one of about a dozen sites I… peruse… when I
found another story about the corporations planning to strip you of your current
rights. Yes '”the” Corporations, like Hollywood and the Movie Industry, and the
Record Labels. In a world where alot of wingnuts fear “the government”, usually
without good reason, there is an issue where we should all be concerned, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Counterfeiting_Trade_Agreement (aka
ACTA). What is ACTA you might be wondering? Well let’s look at wikipedia’s
first paragraph “a proposed plurilateral trade agreement which is
claimed by its proponents to be in response "to the increase in global trade of
counterfeit goods and pirated copyright protected works."^[1]
The scope of ACTA is broad, including counterfeit physical goods,
as well as "internet distribution and information technology".^[2]”
What’s that? It’s a secret internet treaty being negotiated in secret. If you
read through it, which you can’t because it’s negotiated in secret you’d see
the push for a global set of copyright rules that would have ISP’s respond to DMCA-style takedown notices under a 3 strikes rule. In
essence your ISP would be required to terminate your internet connection after
receiving 3 complaints against your IP address. Someone have a beef with you,
they complain 3 times and poof your gone, disconnected from the internet. Not
just you, but everyone in your household because they’re all at the same IP
address.

Safe Harbor? Forget about it. Due process? Gone. And ISPs would lose their
safe harbor status, so they’d be responsible for everything posted from users.
Now think about it, a company would complain against you, demand your user
information and your ISP would hand it over, why wouldn’t they? What’s the
reason to hold out for you and disrupt their business? So YouTube,
Photobucket, Flickr, MySpace, Google/BING/Yahoo… anything with user generated
content… gone. That just leaves “The Corporations” and their product. You
should be worried, you should be concerned. With most people now using the
Internet for fun, communication, sharing, and work it could all come to a
grinding halt. What goods a wifi connection when you can only watch what the
corporations want you to see? You hate ads? You like free software of any kind?
Be prepared for seismic changes if this goes through. Alot of people fear a one
world government, maybe they’re right, maybe they’re wrong, what they should
fear is a One World Corporation with the powers of a government. How much is
your freedom of expression worth? You may find out soon and you might not be
able to afford it.

Want to find out more? http://www.eff.org/issues/acta

Blogged with the Flock Browser

Once more from the top... It's their country and you don't have to visit....

I find this video hilarious

 

The hilarity is in the fact that this guy and his group, don't see where they're in the wrong.  Let me be among the many that say this but it's obviously not getting out into the evangelicals auditory processing centers.  China is communist. China is hosting the Olympics. China is older then America. China has it's own religions.  China has it's own laws. China doesn't have to let you into China.  China doesn't have to like or accept Christianity.  China doesn't want it's populace influenced by radical evangelicals and their beliefs or their dilution of China's quite functional and historical religious belief system.  YOU do not have to go to China.  The American athlete are not their to represent a religious principle, they are there to represent the best and most gifted athletes our country can provide.

 

It amazes me how people go abroad and then have the nerve to be indignant about the local laws and customs of other countries.  Hey buddy, before traveling try reading up on what is and isn't allowed in the country your going to.  That's what embassies are there to assist you with.  And is it me, or is it pretty ballsy to say just because he and his "flock" were  turned away for their refusal to enter the country as guests and follow the countries laws, America as a whole shouldn't participate in the games?  I for one am quite happy this radical nutjob wasn't allowed to go in to another sovereign nation and badger its citizens with religious rhetoric while they tried to enjoy the games.  Leave it to Fox to be all over this one.  Shock and Awe.

 

The games are games, not platforms to espouse your belief system.