Sunday, April 11, 2010

Hello Robots Overlord!

How many people really give thought to the fact that we're supposed to like crappy service?  Sure your told this and that, but when did most people decide to give up independent thought?  This isn't my own personal paranoia, it's all over television and the radio.  It's things like, getting worse service for higher prices (hello airplanes....), or purchasing products are at a premium and finding out they aren't yours (hello music industry...) or how about the discouragement inherent in voting (The 2008 Presidential elections, anyone....)?  Maybe it's just me.

I'm not really that old persay, but I remember when consumers had fair rights and you could have a  disagreement with someone and you could agree to disagree.  Apparently everything's become so divisive that's becoming a bigger and bigger problem for people.  An example,  politics.  In the United States, we are supposed to have a multiparty system.  In case you didn't know, multiparty systems generally consist of more then just two parties in the political process.  Somewhere along the line, most Americans seem to have forgotten this little fact,  now it's Democrats or Republicans, Red vs. Blue, Conservatives versus Liberals, in other words it's all B.S.  When your given a chance to vote, most people (myself included at times) don't fully appreciate the freedom of being able to decide for themselves.  I used to be one of those people "Back in the Day..." as they say, I used to listen to the angry gangster rap and be all "down with the man" and this and that, but it wasn't because I had a reason to be, it was because I was slowly hypnotized into believing that's how I was supposed to feel, I was subliminally co-erced or as Malcolm X famously said "I was hood-winked, bamboozled, led astray,run amok...." It didn't take overly long for my cognitive abilities to kick in and say "hold on, dude, think for yourself..."  Sadly, alot of people these days don't have the same cognitive abilities.  Republicans have branded themselves as the right wing, conservative, Christian party. They represent the old guard, the standard of American values.  The Democrats on the other hand have branded themselves the liberal left wing party,  as far as the media espouses Democrats don't have any similarities with the Republicans, Republican = pro-life, Democrat = pro-choice, Republican  = solid Christian, excuse me as John McCain put it Judeo-Christian values, Democrat = multi religious beliefs, monotheistic, polytheistic, Patriarchal, Matriarchal, etc...

 

This simply isn't the case,  both parties have a lot of similarities but that's all drowned out by the media hype.  Most of the times you have a choice, it becomes drowned out by the pomp and circumstance of smoke and mirrors.  See, we're not supposed to think for ourselves, we're supposed to do what we're told, believe what we're told and doubt or cast aspersions on anyone that dares question that which is believed to be the "gospel"  (religion pun intended).  Don't get me wrong, stereotypes do serve a minute purpose, they give us an inkling on how to deal with a specific type of situation.  The problem with stereotypes is often their used to instill fear or racist beliefs in people and that's never of use to anyone.  I'll give you a typical stereotype.  Tech support phone calls are routed through foreign countries.  This is usually the case, of that I don't deny, I honestly don't remember the last time I called tech support for anything and spoke to another American on the line.  Now that's not to say, foreign help desks are bad.  I'm sure some are quite good, BUT, for the end user it can be a massive headache and can actually turn them off to ever buying from that company again.  It has nothing to do with patriotism, it has to do with convenience and trust me trying to decipher what each other is saying is far more exasperating to both parties then the reason for the phone call, but I digress.

 

We're talking about stereotypes and their uses  the aforementioned scenario brings to mind two different thoughts, the first is sub-par service, the second is a aggravating phone call.  The stereotype should actually help with the situation however.  If you know the person on the other end is going to be fluent in another language and yours may be a distant third then there's no reason to get upset when they don't understand you.  You should also alotte additional time for the phone call and  you shouldn't get frustrated by the experience because really, it should be expected.  If anything, a good experience should be bumped up to excellent because your expectations should have started off low.  But back to the main point, you have a choice in this situation as well, don't deal with that company, not the tech support people, they're doing their job, the company you purchased from however should be penalized.  They know the situation, they know customer unhappiness, but because its cheaper, they outsource and so they should reap the full gamut of good and bad from it.  You have a choice to end or perpetuate the cycle of poor customer experience.

Thursday, April 01, 2010

R.I.P. Microsoft Office

Via Article: r-i-p-microsoft-office

My Unabridged Rant~~

The "Cloud" has been around for like, 30 years, it's not new or anything interesting, in fact in the beginning, most corporations used the "cloud"; at the time, it was called a Workstation. I'm sure all the technarati love this "new" concept. "You mean, I can carry a client like a Macbook Air? I don't have to have a harddrive? All my apps can be run from the 'internet'?" Yeah, in theory that all sounds amazing, people love Gmail and google apps but I'm just not a fan, here's why.

In my computer history class, we looked up the prehistoric days of computing, I got to see old harddrive platters (As big as a car tire!) and we evn had to do some reading and research. According to one of the interesting textbooks and site my Professor offered there was this nugget in 1974 "Researchers at the Xerox Palo Alto Research Center came up with Alto, which was the first workstation with an inbuilt mouse. It had a fair amount of storage capacity and offered menus and icons. It could also connect to a network." Via computer-history... Let me tell you, back then I was like 'Wow, seriously? People had to 'purchase' time to use a mainframe? That's so archaic!' Archaic? Yes. Profitable? Hell Yeah!! Funny thing is, they didnt realize how long term profitable it was. You could sell desktops for more money upfront and be done with the consumer, then flash forward like 30 years and suddenly... Subscriptions are the way to go! As a consumer I hate a subscription, I like a product in my hands, not to mention if you dont control your data, it can be altered, encryption or not. I've been on sites where a news story was 'corrected' or 'pulled' and all trace of the old version was erased, without notice, imagine a world where there are no hard copies, no thanks, I like my quaint, antiquated, slightly cryptic desktop, it's mine, the data's mine, the records are mine, and as long as it's not hacked or formatted the truth/facts/data, whether accurate or my interpretation is mine. Citing security is just whining by lazy people, the same people that would whine if the government were to put in place laws to "make" you be responsible, rather outsource their responsibility, it's pretty sad and kinda pathetic.

But, let's go back to the cost issue. A common misconception is that if everything moves to the web, things will be cheaper, because there wont be exploits or service packs or any other chaff you wanna throw into the air. This is a flawed concept. Regardless of where the actual software is stored, there's going to be R&D and security concerns, there's going to be people paid, the same number of people no doubt, who will troubleshoot, research, and patch flaws, holes, and bad code. These people will still be paid, the only difference... the ONLY difference is the company as a whole will make a hell of a lot more. Now instead of you paying anywhere from $20-$500 for a program they make a continuous stream of revenue from you. Sure they dress it up in s shiny suit and say we're not reaming, but newsflash, if a person gives you a cute card saying they're not reaming you and you feel like your being reamed and they're the only one there.... they're reaming you.

You paying more doesn't even translate to you getting more anyway. An example: I play World of Warcraft, I paid for a retail box, installed the game and I pay a monthly subscription. While paying the subscription and getting minor tweaks of the game, I still have to buy expansions with even more tweaks then before and new zones, places, races, bells and whistles, and it all sounds really awesome. So I buy the next expansion, never mind the fact alot of times it breaks my game and I have to reinstall and alot of the time although I dont get a prorate the system may go offline for "maintenance" for an indeterminate amount of time, I still keep spending my fee to play. Then the new expansion comes out, it promises a ton of new crap to do and see and


Dances

A dance studio is being worked on to allow players to add and change dance animations. This was not featured on release; however, it will most likely be introduced in one of the future content patches for WotLK.


Date published November 13, 2008 and still... no new dances. Sure there were alot of other things added, but I bought it and was excited for new dances. But what incentive is there to provide the feature now? I bought the software, I still pay my subsription and even if I quit I still paid for something I won't get. But see, thats the magic of subscriptions, you can say whatever wacky thing you want, promise it and never have to make good on it. So what if the customer was lied to, they have your money, they even have your subscription from the months you pitifully waited for them to make good and if you give up, well... so?

Conversely, money talks with a retail box. If a reviewer or someone you knows gets a product and it doesnt do what it says, well, noone buys it. There's accountability. You'd better damn well make good on what you say or you wont be around long. That's really what it comes down too, noone likes being accountable anymore, from companies, to politicians, to parents, to children people don't like to have to follow through on what they say. It must be nice to run your business or industry on a quote from a musical.



The sun'll come out
Tomorrow
So ya gotta hang on
'Til tomorrow
Come what may
Tomorrow! Tomorrow!
I love ya Tomorrow!
You're always
A day
A way!


~ Annie